Informed Refusal: A Review
The Medical Protective Company
Most healthcare providers know that a patient’s signature on an informed consent
document may not automatically make the consent valid. The same is true of informed
refusal. Both of these concepts rely on ethical and legal guidelines that acknowledge
the right of competent adults to determine the course of their health care.
This decision-making process requires consultation between doctor and patient to
determine the best treatment option and to ensure that the patient has been a partner
in selecting the appropriate treatment. A signature merely documents the occurrence of
this process; without it, the signature means nothing.
Patient education and documentation are the doctor’s best allies for gaining a patient’s
cooperation in selection of a treatment plan. However, a patient can refuse care even if
the consequences might be dire. When a patient refuses urgently needed care, the
doctor should scrupulously document his or her efforts to explain the risks associated
with lack of treatment.
When the patient has made known his or her decision to refuse treatment, the doctor
or staff member should document the information directly into the patient’s record. He
or she may ask the patient to sign and date the entry. These notes should include the
patient’s diagnosis, the recommended treatment, and the risks that may occur if the
condition isn’t treated. The risks may include: (a) treatment options might be lost as the
condition deteriorates; (b) the doctor may have less opportunity to affect a successful
outcome; (c) the increased possibility of complications; and/or (d) remaining treatment
options might be more expensive.
Patients also have the right to change their minds and withdraw consent for treatment
they have previously authorized, even when the treatment has already been started.
When a patient refuses treatment or wants to abandon a treatment plan, the doctor
should carefully document the decision, using the framework of informed refusal.
Documentation should include the following considerations:
- Was the patient given adequate information about the diagnosis and treatment
options that meet the current standard of care?
- Were the risks and benefits of treatment options discussed with the patient?
- Had doctor and patient discussed and agreed upon their mutual expectations for
a satisfactory outcome?
- Was the patient encouraged to ask questions and voice his or her concerns?
Were these questions and concerns addressed to the patient’s satisfaction?
- Did the doctor ask for the patient’s reason for the decision? Knowing the
patient’s reason for refusal, the doctor can sometimes propose an acceptable
alternative that the patient will accept.
- Did the doctor document his or her explanation of the risks associated with
refusal of treatment? If the doctor opts to use an Informed Refusal form, the
patient should be given a copy of the signed document, and the original should
be retained in the patient’s file. The form should include:
- The diagnosis;
- Treatment options and the treatment plan the patient elected, as well as
risks and benefits associated with each;
- Acknowledgement that the patient refused or terminated treatment;
- Specific risks that might occur if the patient doesn’t receive care, and
acceptance of the risk on the part of the patient; and
- The patient’s signature (if he or she agrees to sign).
Although it is not always necessary that the patient sign an informed refusal statement,
the request forces the patient to acknowledge the seriousness of the untreated
condition. Many patients sign; some refuse. In the event of refusal, it should be noted
that the patient was asked to sign the statement and would not do so.
Some doctors like to have a witness present when a patient refuses needed care. When
an employee has been asked to witness the informed refusal process, he or she should
sign the record and date the signature — whether the patient agrees to sign or not.
By refusing urgently needed care, a patient might increase his or her risk of injury and
possibly increase the doctor’s liability risk. Under these circumstances, some doctors
feel that they have no other choice but to formally acknowledge the patient’s
withdrawal from care. Other doctors continue to see and treat such patients, with the
hope that the patient may change his or her mind or that, if the patient’s condition
deteriorates, emergent care can still be initiated.
If the doctor decides to withdraw from the patient’s care because of the refusal, a
discussion should take place, if possible, before the formal discharge process occurs.
The patient should know that the doctor feels strongly enough about the needed
treatment that he may withdraw rather than stand by as a witness to the deterioration
of the patient’s condition.
Having decided to withdraw, the doctor should formalize the notification with a
discharge letter, giving the patient adequate time (generally 30 days) to find another
practitioner. The letter should be sent to the patient via certified mail with return
receipt requested, and an additional copy should be sent through standard mail. Copies
of the letter should be maintained in the patient’s file.
When a patient refuses care, the doctor needs to ensure that the patient understands
the risks that may result from the decision, and that this warning is thoroughly
documented. When in doubt about how to handle a patient’s refusal of treatment or
withdraw from a treatment plan, the doctor should contact a risk management expert.
This article was produced by the clinical risk management team at Medical Protective, the nation’s oldest professional liability insurance company dedicated to the healthcare professions. For additional information, please contact Laura Cascella at [email protected] or visit the Medical Protective website at http://www.medpro.com/.
© MedPro Group.® All Rights Reserved.